Using Models for Green House Gas Mitigation, Green Tech, Page 58
Using Models for Green House Gas Mitigation | 
 |
|
|
| Note : Best viewed in FF3 or above, IE7 or above |
| Page(s): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 |
| |
Other similar topics highly visited
|
|
Page content:
Decoupled
• A hybrid approach: baseline scenario is
forecast using top-down approach.
Alternative scenarios are modeled as policy
measures that reduce energy consumption
over time.
• In LEAP, these are entered as negative
“wedges” of consumption: subtracted from
baseline energy use in each sector.
• Pros:
- Less data intensive than end-use approach, but
able to capture technology-based policies
(unlike top-down approach).
• Cons:
- Not a full end-use model, so does not give
insights into how energy system structure
might change in long-run. Limited to situations
where measures are a small vs. baseline.
58
|
| |
